Curatorial Magick

You are in a room and it is full of Stuff. Piles of it in no discernible order. You are now told that this Room of Stuff is your life.

What to do first? Tidying up wouldn’t be a bad plan.

So you try to bring order to the Stuff. Some Stuff is similar. You put these things together in trying to make a Tidy Room of Stuff. Other Stuff has certain links to other Stuff. Slowly, the Stuff becomes organised to your own taxonomy. The process requires much upkeep to stop it turning back into a pile of Stuff again. You label things. You arrange things on shelves. You can give everything identifying numbers and locations if you so wish. You may even wish to find out more information about your stuff.

You may now take some pride in your Organised Room of Stuff. What next?

What if I was to tell you that through a system surrounded by mystery and more complex than any ritual of the occult, you could make your Stuff… Better?

There are two reactions, either side of a very thin line of definition. The first is, “How can I use this to make the Stuff more interesting, significant and as exciting to others as it to me?”. The other is a variation along the lines of, “How can I use this for myself?”

The difference between the two reactions is slight because someone with the first may very well become famous or well-known just as someone with the second reaction may very well make some interesting connections and get people excited. The two sides of Curatorial Magick can easily spin around or balance or become a perversion or the other.

Not once have I given any name to your Organised Room of Stuff. Many of you will assume it is a museum store. It could easily be a stockroom of shoes or a pile of books.

The first side of Curatorial Magick is old, academic and very hard to master. The second side is relatively new, borrowing meanings from other places. It is quick, easy and “push-button”. The First side could turn the shoes into part of a museum and the books into a library or an archive. The world of Commerce is very interested in this second side, where the shoes are merchandise and the books are in a bookshop window display. It appears to the world of Commerce that all you need to say to steal the gravitas of the first side is “Curated By…”, thus improving potential sales especially if the supposed curator is famous enough. “Every Sports Shoe on sale was are Curated By…”, “This Year’s Summer Book Club is Curated By…” You can tell which form of Curatorial Magick is in play by how keen they are for you to buy something.

Let us not forget that both Culture and Fashion use the word “Collection”.

There are people around the world performing all forms of the Curatorial Magick. Some are true masters in changing the perception of objects and the people who view them. Others are only inspiring people to the hedonism of consumable goods. I will also say there must be practitioners of variable successes and without clearly defined paths as to where they fall. It depends on what they find in their Room of Stuff as well.

Those on the outside will struggle to spot the difference. It is easier to generalise the intellectually impenetrable. Name everyone a Curator and label a mundane collective of tasks “curation”. Choose, select, publish and put your name on it. Voilà, apparently, you’re now a curator. This method requires an increasing force of personality behind it so it can be successful. Renown will influence people to like what you like. Then you’re a marketing executive’s or brand manager’s dream.

Oh, you want to be a master of the first method? The one that inspires cultural enhancement? The money and the fame do not interest you as much as effecting True change? For that, your Curatorial Magick has to be powered by the force of your own Will.

Save to:
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Technorati
  • email
  • Tumblr
  • Twitter


5 Responses to “Curatorial Magick”

  1. RP says:

    I really appreciate your efforts to bring attention to the misappropriation of the word ‘curator’ and the ways in which curatorial conceits are being bandied about carelessly for commercial purposes. But it hasn’t left me much wiser as to what good curating – the ‘first side’ as you call it above – actually is in practice, except a general sense of Museum Curator Good, Any Other Type of Curator Bad. And I do so want to be a good curator :-( How can one do Curatorial Magick without making libraries and museums, as not all of us can work at these (even though we might like to)?

  2. Pete says:

    I very intentionally didn’t call it Good or Bad curating. It’s a job title, which I struggle to really grasp as a morally questionable living. We’re not talking about arms dealers here.

    I’m not sure what you’re asking me. If you’re after a Curator job description, well, that depends on who you’re working for and can be widespread, very focused or completely different from one place to the next.

    If you’re asking me about curatorial theory, I suggest reading one of the many books about it. All I’m doing here is pointing out how it is often said that the word is “changing” when i really see it as splitting into two distinct professions.

    How to be a Curator of the First without the employment of a cultural institution? That’s a big, difficult and depressing question because it is asking about how to get into a very competitive industry that’s going through an economic kicking.

    Of which, I don’t have an answer beyond some hint of innovation. The attitude is the important foundation. Curators of the First, in theory, wouldn’t need the institutions because they act for other people and not for themselves. Hardly a guarantee of an income, though.

  3. RP says:

    The second half of your answer gets at what I was trying to ask. What is good curating, or let’s say curating of the first type (I didn’t mean to request theoretical or moral definitions, just practical examples), outside of the established cultural arenas? It is a question that is going to be really important, pressing, maybe depressing, as you rightfully point out. I think some of your past posts have touched on possible ways. I don’t know if I’m looking for answers, or just hoping for the start of discussion. Perhaps it’s part of a broader question about the future of curating.

  4. Elizabeth says:

    Have you seen comic George Carlin’s routine about “stuff”? Doesn’t relate to curating at all, but I still recommend it.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MvgN5gCuLac

  5. Pete says:

    I love George Carlin. I consider him my patron saint.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks


Leave a Reply