MacGregorism

Posted by Pete on January 26, 2009 at 3:07 pm.

If it is not clear by now, Neil MacGregor is considered a hero here at New Curator. It must be the time that his particular brand of globalisation, international diplomacy, “international museums” and repatriation policy be recognised with its own name and definition as a museum theory.

How about MacGregorism? Or maybe MacGregorisation, the process of directing a museum globally?

Mr. MacGregor’s lecture on the 250th anniversary is available as a partial transcript and as an eighty minute mp3.

Would “MacGregor’d” work? As in, “That new museum has been MacGregor’d and now they have a international reputation and partnerships all over the world“?

Save to:

2 Comments

Trackbacks / Pingbacks

Neil MacGregor Speaks! « Dan Cull Weblog says:

26 January, 2009 at 6:48 pm

[...] The New Curator article where I first realised the lecture was now online: MacGregorism. [...]
Listen to the Gears: 1 | newcurator says:

3 July, 2009 at 12:50 pm

[...] ‘become adjectives’ (Orwellian, Dickensian etc). Back in January Pete suggested ‘McGregorism‘ to describe the global policies of the BM’s director. Who else from the museum world [...]

Looking at the future of museums, through changes and trends in architecture, individualism, internationalism, expansionism, politics, presentism and technology

You can find NEWCURATOR on Facebook, Twitter, Tumblr, Flickr and Delicious.

My Name is Pete and you can email me: pete (at) newcurator.com

Subscribe to my feed

Twitter
- Give me a HOO-RAR for Newcurator to be the new Getty Museum Director 3 hrs ago
- More updates...
Categories
Archives
Tumblr
Delicious
- Day Against DRM, May 4, 2010 | Musematic 2010/03/09
  “The Day Against DRM will unite a wide range of projects, public interest organizations, web sites and individuals in an effort to raise public awareness to the danger of technology that restricts users’ access to movies, music, literature and software; indeed, all forms of digital data. Many DRM schemes monitor a user’s activities and report what they see to the corporations that impose the DRM.
- The Burke Museum Blog: Your local museum: coming to a pub near you? 2010/03/09
  It’s been six months since the first “Burke Museum Trivia Night” at the College Inn Pub and so far it has proven to be a great way to connect the museum to new audiences and inspire a sense of excitement about the natural and cultural world amongst the people who come to the bar to play trivia.
- Contest-Making the Case for Preservation Action to Save Collections | Musematic 2010/02/27
  Here’s how the contest will work:
  1. Select one target audiences (i.e. decision makers; general audience; and/or library/archive/museum staff) to persuade with a 2-minute speech to support preservation and take preservation action. Selection multiple target audiences, one 2 minute speech per audience.
  
  2. Write a short, compelling, and easy-to-understand argument that will persuade your target audience. Send in one 2 minute speech per target audience
- Boston getting a pop-up design museum, founded by designers - Core77 2010/02/27
  Most museums are founded by wealthy philanthropists, and you'd be hard-pressed to find one founded by designers; the amount of capital required to erect or purchase a building and subsequently fill it is simply beyond the reach of most of us Pantone-pushers.
  
  But that's not stopping product designers Sam Aquillano and Derek Cascio, two Massachusetts-based guys who work for Bose and Philips, respectively. Driven by love for their home state, the pair are planning a sort of pop-up version of a museum pushing Massachusetts-based design:
- Museum 2.0: Responsiveness is the Most Important Part of Participation 2010/02/27
  When it comes to visitor participation in cultural institutions, staff focus too much on #1 and not enough on #2. There are many participatory kiosks that are functional black holes--visitors make videos or draw pictures or write stories, drop them in a slot, and... nothing happens.
  
  Museum professionals tend to think this is OK because they think of the contributory act as the important part of the participation. But without responsiveness, you have a broken feedback loop. The response is what makes participation useful and meaningful to future users, including participants themselves.

newcurator

MacGregorism

2 Comments

Trackbacks / Pingbacks